Finalists for the UK OSPAs Awards Announced
December 6, 2019
The UK OSPAs (Outstanding Security Performance Awards) announced the finalists of the 2020 awards at the International Security Expo which took place on Tuesday 3rd December 2019.
Now in their fourth year, the UK OSPAs serve to recognise the contributions that companies, initiatives, teams and individuals make to the security industry and wider community. The awards recognise extraordinary performance in a variety of different categories.
Security and Fraud Experts – SAFE are pleased to announce that our Security Management Specialist Peter Paskin is one of the finalists under the category of ‘Outstanding Contract Security Manager/Director’.
Finalists will now be put forward to the next stage of the competition and winners will be announced at the OSPAs awards dinner taking place in February 2020.
Share this news story...

SAFE – Security and Fraud Experts is proud to announce its active participation in International Fraud Awareness Week (IFAW) #FraudWeek, taking place from 15–21 November 2026. This global initiative unites organisations and communities around the world to raise awareness, promote education, and take collective action against fraud. As a trusted leader in security and fraud prevention, SAFE is committed to empowering businesses and individuals with the knowledge and tools needed to identify, prevent, and respond to fraudulent activity.

Section 199 of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA) introduced a new corporate offence that significantly raises the bar on fraud risk management. Large organisations can now be criminally liable if an employee, agent, or other associated person commits fraud for the organisation’s benefit—and the organisation did not have reasonable fraud prevention procedures in place. This is a strict liability offence. Prosecutors do not need to prove senior management knowledge or intent. If fraud occurs and the organisation cannot demonstrate an adequate prevention framework, liability follows. The only defence: reasonable procedures The sole statutory defence is that the organisation had reasonable procedures in place to prevent fraud, or that it was reasonable not to have such procedures. In practice, regulators have made clear that “reasonable” will be interpreted robustly. Organisations should be acting now to: Conduct a documented fraud risk assessment covering business models, revenue streams, incentive structures, third-party exposure, and jurisdictional risk. Design proportionate prevention controls aligned to identified risks, including financial controls, approval thresholds, segregation of duties, and oversight of agents and intermediaries. Set the tone from the top , with clear board ownership, senior accountability, and demonstrable commitment to fraud prevention. Implement targeted training and communications so employees and associated persons understand fraud risks, red flags, and reporting routes. Maintain monitoring, reporting, and review mechanisms , including whistleblowing channels, audits, and periodic reassessment as the business evolves. Evidence everything . Policies without implementation, or controls without records, will not support a defence.



